Lithuania in RASFF, 2020–2025
Lithuania was the origin of 117 of 25,645 EU food notifications in 2020–2025 (0.5%), ranking 40th of 160 origins. 20.5% concerned meat and meat products (other than poultry); the most-cited hazard class was pathogenic micro-organisms, and the most-cited substance salmonella.
Food only (feed and food contact materials excluded), all notification types — border rejections, alerts and information notifications — validated 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2025. Download every table (CSV).
Exporting from Lithuania? Get an email when shipments from Lithuania are flagged or rejected at the EU border — before your buyers ask.
One email a week, and only when something matches. We'll send a confirmation link first; unsubscribe any time from the footer of any email.
By year
| Year | Notifications | Share of EU total | Rank among origins |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 13 | 0.4% | 36 |
| 2021 | 7 | 0.2% | 66 |
| 2022 | 20 | 0.5% | 41 |
| 2023 | 24 | 0.6% | 36 |
| 2024 | 23 | 0.5% | 37 |
| 2025 | 30 | 0.6% | 37 |
| 2020–2025 | 117 | 0.5% | 40 |
Tables below show each year 2020–2025; cells are shaded against their row's own peak. Change compares 2025 with 2020 and is shown only where 2020 had at least 10 notifications ("new" where it had none). RASFF Window's data starts on 23 January 2020.
By notification type
| Type | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Border rejection Stopped at the EU's external border; the consignment was not let in. |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Alert A serious risk in a product on the EU market, needing rapid action. |
4 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 45 (38.5%) | — |
| Information for attention A risk found, but the product is not on other members' markets, so they need not act rapidly. |
5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 38 (32.5%) | — |
| Information for follow-up A risk in a product on, or possibly on, other members' markets; follow-up needed, not rapid action. |
4 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 33 (28.2%) | — |
How problems were found
| Found by | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Official control on the market | 12 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 65 (55.6%) | +25% |
| Company's own check | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 24 (20.5%) | — |
| Consumer complaint or illness | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 21 (17.9%) | — |
| Other | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 (3.4%) | — |
| Monitoring or surveillance sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 (1.7%) | — |
| At the EU border | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
Did it reach the EU market?
Of the notifications whose record says either way, 98.2% concerned a product that had been placed on the market; the rest were stopped before it. RASFF records whether a product was on sale, not whether anyone bought it.
| Year | Reached the market | Stopped before | Not stated | Share reached |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| 2022 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 95.0% |
| 2023 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 2024 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| 2025 | 25 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
Distributed to
| Country | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 13 | 41 | — |
| Lithuania | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 31 | — |
| Estonia | 5 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 28 | — |
| Germany | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 19 | — |
| Poland | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | — |
| France | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11 | — |
| Belgium | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | — |
| Netherlands | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | — |
| Ireland | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | — |
| Denmark | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
What was done
A notification can record several actions; each is counted once per notification, so shares can add up to more than 100%.
| Action | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Withdrawn from the market | 3 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 55 (47.0%) | — |
| Authorities or operators informed | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 43 (36.8%) | — |
| Recalled from consumers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 18 (15.4%) | — |
| Not stated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 (8.5%) | — |
| Destroyed | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 (7.7%) | — |
| Detained or held under seal | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 (5.1%) | — |
| Re-dispatched | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 (3.4%) | — |
| Treated, relabelled or diverted | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 (2.6%) | — |
| Re-dispatched or destroyed | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Reinforced checks ordered | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.9%) | new |
Consumer recalls by year
| Year | Recalls | Share of notifications |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 5.0% |
| 2023 | 5 | 20.8% |
| 2024 | 5 | 21.7% |
| 2025 | 4 | 13.3% |
By food category
| Category | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meat and Meat Products (Other Than Poultry) | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 24 (20.5%) | — |
| Poultry Meat and Poultry Meat Products | 7 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 23 (19.7%) | — |
| Fish and Fish Products | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 19 (16.2%) | — |
| Cereals and Bakery Products | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 13 (11.1%) | — |
| Dietetic Foods, Food Supplements and Fortified Foods | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 (8.5%) | — |
| Other Food Product / Mixed | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 (6.0%) | — |
| Nuts, Nut Products and Seeds | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 (5.1%) | — |
| Fats and Oils | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 (3.4%) | — |
| Prepared Dishes and Snacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 (2.6%) | new |
| Soups, Broths, Sauces and Condiments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 (1.7%) | — |
| Confectionery | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Eggs and Egg Products | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Fruits and Vegetables | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Herbs and Spices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.9%) | new |
| Milk and Milk Products | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Water for Human Consumption (Other) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
By hazard class
A notification citing hazards of two classes counts once in each, so rows can add up to more than the total.
| Hazard class | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogenic micro-organisms | 11 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 9 | 15 | 61 (52.1%) | +36% |
| Biological contaminants | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 (3.4%) | — |
| Mycotoxins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 (3.4%) | — |
| Pesticide residues | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 (3.4%) | — |
| Composition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 (2.6%) | — |
| Microbial contaminants (other) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 (2.6%) | — |
| Non-pathogenic micro-organisms | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 (2.6%) | — |
| Allergens | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 (1.7%) | — |
| Environmental pollutants | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 (1.7%) | — |
| Foreign bodies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| Novel food | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.9%) | new |
| Residues of veterinary medicinal products | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | — |
| No hazard recorded | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 30 (25.6%) | — |
By risk level
| Risk decision | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serious | 6 | 6 | 8 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 57 (48.7%) | — |
| Potentially serious | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 16 (13.7%) | — |
| Potential risk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 (12.0%) | — |
| Not serious | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 18 (15.4%) | — |
| No risk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.9%) | new |
| Undecided | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 (9.4%) | — |
Most-cited substances
Labels RASFF records for one substance are merged (e.g. chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-ethyl); chemically distinct compounds stay apart.
Pesticide residues
| Substance | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ethylene oxide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| acetamiprid | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| glyphosate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| imidacloprid | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| propamocarb | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
Other hazards
| Substance | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| salmonella | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 31 | — |
| listeria monocytogenes | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 26 | — |
| escherichia coli shigatoxin-producing | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | — |
| ochratoxin A | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | — |
| tetrahydrocannabinol (thc) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | — |
| opium alkaloids | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
| aflatoxins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| benzo(a)pyrene | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| cannabidiol (cbd) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | new |
| cyanide | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
By month
Pooled across 2020–2025. Each row is shaded against its own peak, so its season shows whatever its size. Border rejections peak in October; Alerts peak in April; Information notifications peak in September.
By notification type
| Type | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Border rejections | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | October |
| Alerts | 6 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 1 | April |
| Information notifications | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 4 | September |
By hazard class
| Hazard class | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogenic micro-organisms | 4 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 3 | September |
| Biological contaminants | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | January |
| Mycotoxins | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | January |
| Pesticide residues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | September |
| Composition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | April |
Notifying member states
| Member state | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2020–2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 29 | — |
| Lithuania | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 27 | — |
| Estonia | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | — |
| Germany | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 12 | — |
| Denmark | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | — |
| Italy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | — |
| Netherlands | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — |
| Poland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | — |
| Belgium | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | — |
Method
Source: RASFF Window, the European Commission's public notification database; every food notification validated in 2020–2025.
A notification naming several origins counts once for each, so origin shares can add up to more than 100%.
Hazard classes are the ones RASFF attaches to each hazard. A hazard without a class is "unclassified"; a notification exported without any hazard is "no hazard recorded".
Counts describe what EU authorities found and reported. They depend on how often each product is checked, so they are not a rate of unsafe food.
Licence: CC-BY-4.0. Cite as "Lithuania food safety record, 2020–2025: EU RASFF", RASFF Trends, 2026-11-07, https://rasff.fruit-risk.com/reports/lithuania.html.